申家年;杨久莹;周放;张健;杨贯楠;仇亚平;孙艳;

• 1:东北石油大学地球科学学院

• 2:中国石油天然气股份有限公司西南管道分公司

• 3:大庆油田有限责任公司第二采油厂

• 4:长城钻探工程有限公司测井公司

摘要(Abstract)：

干酪根有机元素的范氏图法是被广泛采用的划分干酪根类型的方法,在实践中发现范氏图与干酪根类型指数TI法划分的结果有较大出入.利用海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷143个样品实测的干酪根类型指数TI和有机元素数据,进行非线性回归,提出一种较为简洁的利用有机元素H/C、O/C直接计算TI的公式,将计算结果称作ETI;利用松辽盆地北部和海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷51个样品对ETI进行验证.结果表明,ETI确定干酪根类型与TI法的一致性明显优于范氏图法与TI法的一致性.ETI的提出为利用干酪根有机元素测试结果评估干酪根类型提供新的研究思路和方法.

关键词(KeyWords)：干酪根;类型划分;范氏图;TI指数;有机元素

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author):申家年;杨久莹;周放;张健;杨贯楠;仇亚平;孙艳;

Email:

参考文献(References)：

• [1]蒂索B P,威尔特D H.石油形成和分布—油气勘探新途径[M].郝石生,译.北京:石油工业出版社,1982:87-102.Tissot B P,Welte D H.Petroleum formation and distribution—A new oil and gas exploration way[M].Translated by Hao Shisheng.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1982:87-102.

• [2]杨万里,李永康,高瑞祺,等.松辽盆地陆相生油生油母质的类型与演化模式[J].中国科学,1981(8):1000-1009.Yang Wangli,Li Yongkang,Gao Ruiqi,et al.Continental oil generation generative kerogen types and evolution models in the Songliao basin[J].Science China,1981(8):1000-1009.

• [3]黄第藩,李晋超,张大江.干酪根类型划分及其分类参数的有效性和相关性[J].沉积学报,1984,2(3):18-35.Huang Difan,Li Jinchao,Zhang Dajiang.Kerogen types and study on effectiveness limitation and interrelation of their identification parameters[J].Acta Sedimentological Sinica,1984,2(3):18-35.

• [4]曹庆英.透射光下干酪根显微组分鉴定及类型划分[J].石油勘探与开发,1985,6(5):14-24.Cao Qingying.Identification of microcomponents and types of kerogen under transmitted light[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1985,6(5):14-24.

• [5]SY/T 5735-1995,陆相烃源岩地球化学评价方法[S].SY/T 5735-1995,The evaluation method of terrestrial source rocks geochemistry[S].

• [6]涂建淇,王淑燕,费轩冬.透射光-荧光干酪根有机显微组分的划分[J].石油勘探与开发,1998,25(2):27-32.Tu Jianqi,Wang Shuyan,Fei Xuandong.Classification of the macerals of kerogen in hydrocarbon source rocks by transmitted lightfluorescence[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development,1998,25(2):27-32.

• [7]蒂索B P,威尔特D H.石油形成与分布[M].2版.徐永元,译.北京:石油工业出版社,1989:89-105.Tissot B P,Welte D H.Petroleum formation and occurrence[M].2nd Ed.Translated by Xu Yongyuan.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1989:89-105.

• [8]涂建琪,王淑芝,费轩冬.干酪根有机质类型划分的若干问题的探讨[J].石油实验地质,1998,11(2):187-192.Tu Jianqi,Wang Shuzhi,Fei Xuandong.Discussion on certain proble of organic matter types in kerogen[J].Experimental Peroleum Geology,1998,11(2):187-192.

• [9]李贤庆,钟宁宁,熊波,等.全岩分析与干酪根分析的对比研究[J].西南石油学院学报,1996,18(1):27-34.Li Xianqing,Zhong Ningning,Xiong Bo,et al.The comparative study between whole rock analysis and kerogen analysis[J].Journal of Southwestern Petroleum Institute,1996,18(1):27-34.

• [10]程克明,王铁冠,钟宁宁,等.烃源岩地球化学[M].北京:科学出版社,1995:17-35.Cheng Keming,Wang Tieguan,Zhong Ningning,et al.Source rocks geochemistry[M].Beijing:Science Press,1995:17-35.

• [11]李贤庆,马安来,钟宁宁,烃源岩有机岩石学研究方法与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,1997:85-95.Li Xianqing,Ma Anlai,Zhong Ningning.The research methodology and application of source rocks’organic petrology[M].Chongqing:Chongqing University Press,1997:85-95.

• [12]秦建中.中国烃源岩[M].北京:科学出版社,2005:20-39.Qing Jianzhong.Source rocks in China[M].Beijing:Science Press,2005:20-39.

• [13]马贡L B,道W G.含油气系统—从烃源岩到圈闭[M].张刚,译.北京:石油工业出版社,1998:107-141.Magoon L B,Dow W G.The petroleum system—From source rocks to trap[M].Translated by Zhang Gang.Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1998:107-141.

• [14]卢双舫,庞雄奇,李泰明,等.干酪根类型数值化的探讨[J].天然气工业,1985,6(3):17-24.Lu Shuangfang,Pang Xiongqi,Li Taiming,et al.A Discussion on the digitalization of kerogen types[J].Natural Gas Industry,1985,6(3):17-24.

• [15]卢双舫,刘晓艳,王子文.干酪根类型数值化的再探讨[J].大庆石油学院学报,1993,17(S1):29-33.Lu Shuangfang,Liu Xiaoyan,Wang Ziwen.Review on the digitalization of kerogen types[J].Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute,1993,17(S1):29-33.

• [16]卢双舫,张敏.油气地球化学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008:209-210.Lu Shuangfang,Zhang Min.Oil and gas geochemistry[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2008:209-210.